
* According to the Communications Act, MACRA may, where necessary, seek the general guidance direction of the Minister as to the manner in which it is to carry out its duties under this Act
* The directions given by the Minister under subsection (1) shall be in writing and shall be published in the Gazette
* Except as provided for under this Act or any other law, the Authority shall be independent in the performance it is functions
By Duncan Mlanjira
By ordering Malawi Communications Regulatory Authority (MACRA) to vacate the injunction that was obtained against MultiChoice Malawi from effecting price adjustments, Minister of Information Moses Kunkuyu has circumvented the Law as the directive was first supposed to be gazetted.
According to the Communications Act, MACRA “may, where necessary, seek the general guidance direction of the Minister as to the manner in which it is to carry out its duties under this Act”.
“The directions given by the Minister under subsection (1) shall be in writing and shall be published in the Gazette” and that “except as provided for under this Act or any other law, the Authority shall be independent in the performance it is functions”.
Our source in the legal profession asks if from the section in the Act, what the Kunkuyu issued is a policy direction, adding: “Did MACRA ask for his guidance on a general policy direction? If it did, has the Minister issued such a direction? If he has, has it been gazetted?”
According to Times360 Malawi, Kunkuyu is reported to have ordered MACRA to vacate the injunction, saying while government appreciates the independence of the regulatory body, it has become necessary for MACRA to seek direction from the Ministry.
Times360 quotes the order as saying: “I, therefore, direct MACRA to take immediate steps to restore the status quo prior to the time when it obtained injunctive relief so that efforts to resolve the matter can take place in earnest and outside the yoke of litigation.”
Times360 contacted Kunkuyu, who confirmed issuing the order but refused to shed more light, arguing its an order to MACRA and he expects “MACRA to respect the order”.
But from the information Maravi Express has gathered, on the circumstances that led to the impasse between MultiChoice Malawi and MACRA — is a case where essentially MultiChoice tried to force the regulator to abdicate from its tariff regulation statutory consumer protection mandate as they wanted their tariffs to be imposed unchecked.
Our investigations show that the current matter was not as a result of MACRA rejecting MultiChoice tariff request made on June 3, 2022, but its conduct to proceed to implement tariffs without approval from the Authority.
It should also be noted that MultiChoice is the one that took MACRA to Court in the first place and that it unilaterally decided to withdraw its DStv services after the Court decided against it on August 8, 2023.

Advertisement
We thus highlight the chronological order of events that led to MultiChoice Africa to withdraw its DStv service:
1. On 3rd June 2022 – Multichoice Malawi (MCM) submits a tariff request to MACRA for DStv and GOtv services;
2. On 21st June 2022 – MCM makes a public announcement to adjust tariffs effective 1st August 2022 before the MACRA Board convenes for an approval of the same;
3. On 24th June 2022 – MACRA Technical Committee met to consider tariff requests, however, MCM’s request was not deliberated due to the public announcement on the price adjustment made on 21st June 2022;
4. On 28th June 2022 – MACRA notified MCM of a preliminary finding of breach of section 74(1) of the Communications Act and Clause 11.2 of MCM’s SMS licence for implementing DStv tariff adjustment without prior approval from MACRA;
5. On or around 12th July 2022 – MCM applied to the High Court for permission to commence judicial review proceedings, challenging MACRA’s preliminary finding that MCM had breached the Communications Act and its licence and further challenging MACRA’s decision to invite MCM to a disciplinary hearing. MCM also applied for an injunction against the hearing;
6. On 13th July 2022 – MACRA suspended MCM’s disciplinary hearing pending the decision of the High Court on MCM’s application to commence judicial review proceedings;
7. On 25th July 2022 – the High Court refused to permit MCM to commence judicial review proceedings against MACRA because the application was premature. MCM should have first attended the disciplinary hearing before approaching the High Court. The application for injunction was also dismissed;
8. On 1st August 2022 – MCM proceeded to implement the tariff adjustments without approval from MACRA Board;
9. On 28th November 2022 – MCM was heard before the Legal and Administration Committee (LAC) of the Board of MACRA, which recommended to the Board to find MCM in of breach of the Communications Act and the licence for implementing tariff changes without prior approval;
10. On 22nd December 2022 – MACRA Board upheld the recommendation by the Legal and Administration Committee and made a final finding of breach. The Board imposed the following sanctions:
a. that MCM should pay K10 million fine;
b. cease and desist from implementing the revised and unapproved tariff structure; and
c. refund the customers the difference between the unapproved tariffs and the approved tariffs.

Advertisement
11. On 13th January 2023 – MCM was granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings against MACRA and obtained an injunction restraining MACRA from implementing the decision in 10 above, to find MCM in breach and from implementing the consequential sanctions imposed on MCM;
12. On 17th January 2023 – MACRA DG meets with MCM General Manager at BICC in Lilongwe to map a way forward;
13. From 23rd to 27th January 2023 – MACRA and MCM engaged at technical level at Nkopola Lodge in Mangochi for an amicable settlement of the court case. But negotiations failed due to the insistence of MCM that DStv tariffs should not be subject to prior approval by MACRA;
14. On 14th June 2023 – MACRA Board met with MCM/Multichoice Africa Holdings (MAH) led by their Group CEO in Salima to discuss on possible settlement out of court of the matter;
15. On 11th July 2023 – MACRA Board approved the recommendations from the Salima meeting to allow MCM to ‘notify’ the tariffs to the Authority but with MACRA reserving the right to intervene whenever it deemed the proposed tariff implementation unfair or unjust. MACRA wrote MCM of the proposal. MCM has not responded;
16. On 17th July 2023 – MCM notified MACRA of the proposed tariff increase for DSTV services effective 1st August 2023;
17. On 28th July 2023 – MACRA obtained an injunction from High Court restraining MCM from implementing second DSTV tariffs without prior approval from MACRA;
18. On 31 July 2023 – MCM obtained a temporary relief/order to stay implementing the injunction that MACRA obtained. The temporary stay was granted to allow MCA to rectify its system, which was already set to bill using the new tariffs. The order was for four days until 3rd August 2023;
19. On 1st August 2023 – MCM proceeded to implement the second tariff adjustment without approval from MACRA Board;
20. On 4th August 2023 – MCM applied to the High Court ex parte (without giving notice of the application to MACRA) for directions on how it should conduct itself and to avoid being in contempt of court in view of the fact that Multichoice Africa Holdings Ltd (MAH) had stated it could not reverse the DSTV tariff adjustment for Malawi.
The High Court directed that the application be heard inter parte (both parties to be present at the hearing) on 7th August 2023. Consequently, the court extended the stay order to 7th August 2023, the date of the inter parte hearing;
21. On 8th August 2023 – the High Court hearing of both parties on the injunction was held and the High Court upheld the injunction obtained by MACRA and vacated the stay order obtained by MCM;
22. On 8th August 2023 – MCM announced the withdrawal of DStv services in Malawi;
Meanwhile, the full trial of this case is supposed to be held on Friday August 25, 2023.
As the impasse ensued, Kunkuyu — together with his counterpart of Finance, Sosten Gwengwe — reportedly held a virtual meeting on August 9 with MultiChoice Africa Holdings as government announced its intention to intervene on this impasse.
Kunkuyu had earlier announced that Government would intervene soon after MultiChoice Africa Holdings announced the withdraw of the DStv services following MACRA’s firm resolve stopping the service provider from effecting tariff adjustment without the approval of the communications regulator.
MultiChoice Africa Holdings’ group executive-corporate affairs & stakeholder relations, Keabetswe Modimoeng wrote the two Ministers in reference to the virtual meeting they had on August 9 as to what the continent’s service provider regarded as “hostile regulatory operating environment that it finds itself in and the very unfortunate decision that MAH found itself having to make to withdraw the provision of its DStv services in Malawi”.
The detailed letter highlights circumstances that has led to the impasse, saying: “MAH took its decision on the DStv service upon careful consideration of the legal risks posed to the local subscription management service (SMS) provider, MultiChoice Malawi — as well as the overall regulatory hostility and uncertainty that impacts the investment environment and growth of the business in Malawi.
After detailing all its major areas of concern for the two Ministers’ “kind consideration”, MAH proposed a way forward and conclusion, saying they value their subscribers in Malawi, and would prefer to resolve the current issues and “find a lasting solution to the current untenable environment”.

Advertisement
“We are of the view that this could be achieved through the following:
* The genesis of all the issues we have in Malawi lies in the continued conflation of the roles played by MCM and MAH. We believe that it would be beneficial for the Authority to, in line with the provisions of the Communications Act, 2016, resume appropriately regulating MCM as an SMS provider, instead of seeking to impose broadcasting obligations on an entity that does not provide DStv;
* To the extent that the Authority has concerns regarding the appropriate licensing of international broadcasting services, we propose that this matter be opened for consultation through which the Authority can find a suitable and enforceable solution, which ensures an investor friendly environment in the communications sector.
“This includes, for example, the requirement for foreign services to notify and file their tariffs with the Authority. A notification regime is more suited for support services like MCM that provide customer support services for international audio visual content providers such as MAH;
* Pending finalisation of the review of the regulatory framework, MAH is permitted to proceed to provide services at the tariffs implemented in August 2023 and is required to notify the Authority of further adjustments to tariffs. This could be done through the withdrawal of the injunction against MCM.

Advertisement
One thought on “Kunkuyu circumvents the Law by ordering MACRA to vacate the injunction that was obtained against MultiChoice Malawi to effect price adjustments”
Comments are closed.