MACRA deems Mibawa, Times, Zodiak as breaching political broadcasts

By Duncan Mlanjira

Malawi Communications Regulatory Authority (MACRA) is taking to task Mibawa Television, Times Television (TTV), Times Radio Zodiak Broadcasting Station (TV and Radio) on suspicion that they are broadcasting indecent, insulting and offensive material during the current political campaign meetings.

MACRA says following a preliminary assessment of some political broadcasts, it indicate these broadcasters are breaching section 22 of the Second Schedule to the Communications Act, 2016.

MARCA further says it will submit a report to the Broadcasting Monitoring and Complaints Committee for further action in line with rule 54 of the Communication (Broadcasting) Regulations, 2019. 

The Broadcasting Monitoring and Complaints Committee is established under rule 54 of the Communications (Broadcasting) Regulations, 2019 to handle political broadcasting complaints during elections.

It comprises MACRA itself; Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC); Malawi Law Society; Center for Multiparty Democracy (CMD); Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) Malawi Chapter; Media Council of Malawi, National Initiative for Civic Education (NICE) and the Malawi Human Rights Commission (MHRC).

“All broadcasting licensees are, therefore, being urged to abide by the Communications Act, Broadcasting Regulations, Licence Conditions and Media Code of Conduct on Reporting Elections.

“MACRA would like to assure the general public that it shall continue to discharge its broadcasting monitoring mandate during this election period and shall not hesitate to invoke regulatory action against any broadcaster in breach of relevant laws and regulations.”

MACRA then asks the general public to submit all political broadcast complaints to the Broadcasting Monitoring and Complaints Committee through the Director General.

Meanwhile, MACRA’s the Broadcasting Monitoring and Complaints Committee summoned Malawi Broadcasting Corporation (MBC) to appear before it last Wednesday, May 20 MBC for broadcasting offensive and vulgar comments that targeted Vice-president Saulos Chilima.

Vice-President Saulos Chilima

This followed a complaint filed by lawyers, Jivason & Company, representing private lawyer Nicely Msowoya in conjunction with three civil rights society organizations — Human Rights Defenders Coalition (HRDC), Church & Society of the CCAP Livingstonia Synod and Youth & Society (YAS) that asked to take MBC Television and Radio off-air or they would immediately file for an order in the High Court, compelling MACRA to close MBC until the professional personnel there at are flushed out and duly replaced.

The Broadcasting Monitoring and Complaints Committee has since presented its report to MACRA’s Board for further action.

MACRA Director General Godfrey Itaye

Director General, Godfrey Itaye has told the petitioners that MACRA could not take off-air MBC Television and Radio as per their demand, as doing so is demanding that the regulator goes against natural justice requirements in its governing laws.

Following the public furore that attracted the offensive broadcast, MBC management suspended the culprits, Henry Haukeya, Mercy Zamawa, Kondwani Chinele and a video editor following public outcry for the use of swearwords against Chilima during a news broadcast on Monday evening and also issued a public apology.


In their petition to MACRA, the four complainants had said MBC “is a creature of Parliament and that its broadcasting licence is statutory, per section 108 of the Communications Act”.

“Although MBC is a statutory licence under the Communications Act, this statutory licence is revocable by MACRA under section 43 of the Communications Act in circumstances, like the one in question herein, where MBC has breached its obligations.

“Our clients have noted that MBC has gone overboard in contravening its statutory duties under the Communications Act.

MBC is always accused of bias

“MBC is perpetually in breach of its public service obligations under the Act and the broadcaster has clearly shown the whole world that it has no respect for human rights, rule of law and the Constitution, as required of it under section 109 of the Communications Act.”

They further said MBC is denying them and the nation at large their right to credible information and it is leading the country astray, yet MACRA does not appear to take any efforts to enforce the Communications Act against MBC.

Haukeya, one of the suspended staff

In the midst of the public furore and the petition from the four, MACRA issued a statement that it had “commenced action against MBC in line with the Communications Act and its Regulations and has, therefore, given MBC a statutory notice of seven (7) days to make representations on the preliminary findings of breach as stipulated under regulation 32(3)(e) of the Communications (Telecommunications and Broadcasting Licensing) Regulations, 2016”.

MACRA furthers reminded broadcasters of their duty to ensure equitable allocation of airtime and avoid hate speech, abusive and inflammatory language especially during the official campaign period. 

Coronavirus alert

MACRA’s Director General Itaye then directly responded to the four petitioners, first acknowledging their assertions that MBC is indeed a creature of statute and is in fact licensed under Section 108 of the Communications Act.

“We further acknowledge that licences issued under the Communications Act are revocable for substantial breaches of the Act, Regulations and Licences,” says Itaye. 

“However, this is subject to various rules under the Act and the Regulations.

Lawyer Nicely Msowoya

“You will, therefore, appreciate that as a creature of statute, any action that MACRA takes has to conform to its governing legal instruments i.e. the Communications Act, 2016 and the Communications (Broadcasting) Regulations Act, 2019.

“It is these governing legal instruments that lie down the procedures that reflect rules of natural justice which MACRA should follow before invoking any regulatory sanctions,” said Itaye making reference to section 43 (2), (3) & (4) of the Act as well as regulation 50(3) and (4) of the Regulations.

Coronavirus alert

He further reiterated that political election broadcast during election period are specifically regulated under Part V of Communications (Broadcasting) Regulations, 2019 and that these regulations require that MACRA make any regulatory sanctions subject to recommendations of a Broadcasting Monitoring & Complaints Committee established under rule 54.